Talk:Republic Records

Latest comment: 10 months ago by Shotguntony in topic Earlier label by the same name

The Republic name

edit

Discussion of how the label got its' name may be significant, considering the existence of Republic Pictures for decades prior to the label's start.

2001:558:6016:33:75E8:F4E7:E337:8E69 (talk) 03:34, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Republic Records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal - Universal Republic Records -> Republic Records

edit

Hi folks, I think we should consolidate the page at Universal Republic Records into this one, as there seems to be little on that page that isn't also on this in a more up to date form. Since Republic's existence as Universal Republic only lasted 6 years or so, I think it's justified as a section of this page, and not a standalone.

So: Universal Republic Records would be merged into Republic Records. Any opinions? UaineSean (talk) 04:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Merge - Agreed the page needs to be merged. Duplicate information. Karst (talk) 09:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Merge - Just reviving this discussion since I was doing some research on labels. This is entirely unrelated to my previous editing history and Republic is not a client of my firm (yet), but this should definitely be merged. I'm happy to learn how to do this if you guys are okay with it. This can easily be consolidated in the 'history' section. JacobMW (talk) 23:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Merge - I think after being discussed for over a year this and no dissenting opinions should be a good sign the merge should go through. It is important to make sure the time when it was Universal Republic be documented, i.e. any artists signing under Universal Republic should be noted. Ray (talk) 21:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Merge - and closed. JSFarman (talk) 02:38, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Jonas Brothers source

edit

Instead of edit warring with IPs over whether the Jonas Brothers should be included, can some just provide one clean-cut reliable source that they are? If we can, we'll add it, and if we can't we could add an editor-only note regarding their lack of status for the time being.

Thanks, Elfabet (talk) 12:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Dsturgill9876: We need a reliable, secondary source for that. Would you happen to have one you could share? Otherwise, if it's not reported by a reputable, neutral secondary source, we should not include the information. Thanks, Elfabet (talk) 12:04, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Earlier label by the same name

edit

There was another Republic Records back around 1980 - I know this from having in my record collection one of its releases (Arthur Brown's "Requiem" album)

Shotguntony (talk) 12:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply