Talk:Republican Main Street Partnership
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. Edits made by the below user(s) were last checked for neutrality on 2019-05-22 by C.Fred.
|
Merge proposal
editWhat do you think about merging this article with Main Street Republicans? --Checco 17:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, and the merged article should be at the official name of the group. —Nightstallion 11:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. The name of this article should be the name of the article after the merge. --Checco 12:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't know, Main Street Republicans has two other definitions. ←BenB4 17:47, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Liberal conservatives
editSo I'm not sure why liberal conservativism is there. I looked at the history and someone just placed it there with no sources. It could be possible that they simply misunderstood what the term means, because it doesn't mean moderate conservative or liberal Republican, it refers to a conservative that favors laissez-faire or free market economics. This is in contrast to more aristocratic or economically nationalistic forms of conservativism. I think it should just be deleted, but I'd rather hear what everyone else thinks first. Thank you AlexanderLevian (talk) 06:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- It should be deleted. Good job on the sources for 'center-right' BTW. Toa Nidhiki05 14:23, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Governors?
editIs there no sitting governor, who is a member? Charlie Baker and Bruce Rauner for example are very moderate Republicans. --Jerchel (talk) 09:48, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
The Main Street Partnership currently has no sitting governors. It is a Congressional organization, a coalition of Members of the House and Senate. --BryanpRMSP 17:49, 15 March 2017
Page Up to Date
editI have gone through and updated information on this page based on the organizations most recent website updates.[1] The group also has a new logo that needs updating. I am requesting the issues message template be removed. --BryanpRMSP (talk) 21:59, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
References
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Republican Main Street Partnership. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081011021849/http://rockefeller.dartmouth.edu/assets/pdf/gte_lucasdeutchman.pdf to http://rockefeller.dartmouth.edu/assets/pdf/gte_lucasdeutchman.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)