Talk:Res judicata

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

zh:定讞

Stephen Lawrence case

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The Stephen Lawrence case is not relevant to res judicata -- which applies to CIVIL law, not criminal law.

The equivalent concept in criminal law is double jeopardy -- which is the doctrine that one cannot be re-tried (by the same sovereign) for a crime of which one has been previously acquitted.

I have therefore removed the Stephen Lawrence case from this article.

73.162.218.153 (talk) 18:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Feb. 2022 Dubious Tag

The dubious tag has been inserted with respect to use of res judicata to bar a plaintiff from proceeding outside of a class action lawsuit. This is because it is well known that Plaintiffs whom would be considered part of a class have a right to opt out of the class to seek different relief or to litigate additional issues not presented in the class action itself. The contention is therefore misleading in the manner it is presented here. 98.178.191.34 (talk) 22:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic