Talk:Resolution Guyot
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Enter Demoman in topic Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 February 2023
 | Resolution Guyot is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||
 | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 2, 2023. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Bathymetric map
edit@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Is there any reason this page doesn't have a figure depicting the bathymetry and shape of Resolution Guyot? I'm not seeing anything about it on the FAC. I can try and make one using GEBCO data and GMT. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 09:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- For the standard reason why Wikipedia articles don't have an image: There isn't a non-copyrighted one. If you can create or get a non-copyrighted one that would be great. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- I added these two images; please let me know if you have any feedback.
- I added these two images; please let me know if you have any feedback.
Balon Greyjoy (talk) 12:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Seems good but I am a little concerned that by using GEBCO data it might be a derivative work of GEBCO; Nikkimaria, what say you? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- If you're only using data it's fine - data is not typically copyrightable. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- The gridded bathymetric data is the only thing I got from GEBCO; I wrote the script to generate the plots (and am also a maintainer for PyGMT software). Balon Greyjoy (talk) 14:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Seems like you are fine to add these, then. Balon Greyjoy, if whatever-you-used-to-create-these-images is scalable, there is a lot of other articles that could similary be expanded. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- The gridded bathymetric data is the only thing I got from GEBCO; I wrote the script to generate the plots (and am also a maintainer for PyGMT software). Balon Greyjoy (talk) 14:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- If you're only using data it's fine - data is not typically copyrightable. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
@Jo-Jo Eumerus and Vida0007: Would you like any changes or updates to the 3D bathymetric map for this article? I saw that it's nominated over at WP:TFAR and want to let you know that I can change the figure if you think it could be improved (different perspective angle, different region covered in the map, different color scheme). Balon Greyjoy (talk) 13:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- I'm okay with the current bathymetric map, but I wouldn't mind to see a different angle to it. Vida0007 (talk) 13:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Same for me. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:04, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 February 2023
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "The guyot was probably formed by a" to "The guyot was likely formed by a" Enter Demoman (talk) 21:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done: same meaning. I think the current version is clearer. – small jars tc15:11, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
