Talk:Responsibility to protect in China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese politics (assessed as Low-importance).

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[War in Darfur#Russian and Chinese undermining of sanctions|resisting a Security Council resolution]] The anchor (#Russian and Chinese undermining of sanctions) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Rape of Nanjing

Not that it's not a mass atrocity, but I'm not sure that Japan's killing of Chinese civilians in the Rape of Nanjing really belongs in this article. Given that the debate over the R2P is specifically in regards to international intervention in DOMESTIC affairs, and that that particular piece of the article is about the vulnerability of Chinese civilians to atrocities imposed by their own government, I think the Sino-Japanese War isn't relevant. Unless someone had a particular reason for including it/thinking it was relevant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.232.73.45 (talk) 18:51, 25 March 2012

Add topic