Talk:Restoring Force (album)
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Armbrust in topic Requested move
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Restoring Force (album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Album been leaked?
editI have found this on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjCCbpFKP7c It contains both Bones Exposed and You're Not Alone off the album and its whole length matches the albums length calculated on this page. Although it as a unreliable source I believe the album has been leaked. I haven't found any official announcement about this situation. Should it be put on the article or shall we wait until an official announcement has been made? - SilentDan297 talk 08:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Per WP:LEAK, leaks should not be mentioned or advertised in articles, unless something monumental results from it. This would include either the album's release being pushed up or back, the track list being changed, bonus tracks being added, etc. STATic message me! 17:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 12:38, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
– If someone searches for the title with a capital F, they will be referring to the album. It will also make the title shorter. --MASHAUNIX 20:12, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination fixed: this would only involve one move. --BDD (talk) 22:10, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
- Against - A capital letter isn't sufficient enough to distinguish between two completely different articles, if anything the argument you are using is a reason not to move it. SilentDan297 talk 22:26, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose – disagree with nom's assertion that "If someone searches for the title with a capital F, they will be referring to the album." It is well known that many people over-capitalize for no very good reason. Distinguishing article titles by case alone is unusual, and not a good idea, Red Meat notwithstanding. Dicklyon (talk) 05:17, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per above. STATic message me! 05:20, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose - and I'm less and less convinced of the merits of Red Meat also. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.