Talk:Restriction enzyme mediated integration
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz01 in topic Advantages and disadvantages section
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
[Untitled]
editStarted this page after realising there is not one in English but one does exist in French https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restriction_enzyme_mediated_integration
It is a technique originally used in 1991 and is still in use today.
Have started off the page with a few references.
Hyphen
editQuestion: is it more commonly used with a hyphen ("restriction enzyme-mediated integration") or without (current title)? Me, Myself & I (☮) (talk) 00:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- You may be right, the original paper does not seem to have it hyphenated by the following papers after its, especially from 2000 and 2006, seem to use it with the hyphen ("restriction enzyme-mediated integration"). In this case, how would you go about editing the page name? Even though it does not sound like a big thing but we can perhaps follow the more common naming convention. Original Paper: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1881899. 2000 Paper: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11106028. 2006 Paper: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16957292
- Another question, what are your views on also adding the abbreviation, REMI, in the title? ("Restriction enzyme-mediated integration, REMI") — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz01 (talk • contribs) 08:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Advantages and disadvantages section
editCan elaborate on the advantages and disadvantages of this technique when compared to the current techniques — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz01 (talk • contribs) 11:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)