Talk:Results of the 1965 Western Australian state election (Legislative Assembly)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Australia: Western Australia / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Results of the 1965 Western Australian state election (Legislative Assembly) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Reverted Tags

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why do you say the tags are inappropriate? There is only one source, meaning there needs to be more of them for the sake of accuracy, and footnotes are needed to show that the references actually verify the material. Compassionate727 (talk) 18:54, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is an election results page, meaning it refers to a specific, undisputed and unchangeable set of data, to which there is an official record to which it can be cited. It is correctly cited to the most authoritative compilation of these results, put together by one of the country's foremost academics in this area in conjunction with the Parliamentary Library. It is horribly counterintuitive to insist that people add less reliable sources for no purpose beyond allowing some dude running around with a bot to tick an extra box. The Drover's Wife (talk) 19:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic