Talk:Reticulate whipray/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 12:16, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Will commence read through and post any comments as I come across issues. If neccessary I might make alterations to prose as I proceed - if I accidently change the meaning then please feel free to reverse those changes. Miyagawa (talk) 12:16, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Had to look up "fishes" because I was sure the correct plural was simply fish - but you were right, it's fishes when talking about multiple different species. Miyagawa (talk) 12:50, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Can't see any issues with the article that would prevent it from being graded a GA. I can tell you've done a few of these. :) Miyagawa (talk) 16:32, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Yzx (talk) 17:33, 12 April 2010 (UTC)