Talk:Retirement planning

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why this website getting special favors from you ?

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

@kuru

Regarding Retirement_Planning Page of wiki

You deleted a website from external links that I added (futureyears.com), on the pretext that it is promotional content ,has Google ads etc.

If this is the parameter than how superretirementplans.com meets those standards as it is filled with all kinds of ads,the content is very low and the website has very low ranking in google .In fact the website is made purely for advertisements and affiliate marketing.

I don't understand why you kept that link in the external ,is this website immune to wiki policies or you personally have some liking for this website ? Boomer577 (talk) 05:02, 27 June 2009 (UTC)boomer577Reply

Genuine concern or another case of "someone else gets to spam, why can't I spam too?" Worry not, I have liquidated that link and will watch this page so that no one can spam it again. We depend on learned contributors such as yourself to point out these oversights. TastyPoutine ^{talk (if you dare)} 05:06, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

If somebody who's not working for wiki adds a link in 'External Links 'it is almost everytime considered as spam by the admins ,unless its an .gov ,.edu ,.mil link .But when some low quality link is totally ignored by an admin while deleting other far better websites ,it raises suspision .Moreover, it can't be called anything other than double standards.

Anyhow I am happy that TastyPoutine has removed that link.Boomer577 (talk) 05:57, 27 June 2009 (UTC)boomer557Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 March 2024 and 4 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): YL10229 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by YL10229 (talk) 03:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic