Talk:Return of the Obra Dinn/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Casliber in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply


Taking a look now....you know the drill...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

A nice read overall. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:  
Manual of Style compliance:  

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:  
Citations to reliable sources, where required:  
No original research:  

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:  
Focused:  

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:  

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):  

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  


Overall:

Pass or Fail:   - just minor quibbles really. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi Cas, thanks for the review. Do you mind giving me a couple days to have a chance to look at these points/changes? Should be less than a week. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 06:46, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
no problemo Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi Cas, I've answered all of the above, although some of the points I haven't actioned.Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:11, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Forgot the ping. Casliber, I've addressed the above. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 13:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

all Good....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply