 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
‹See TfM›
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Following a request for an expert to edit this page, I have significantly upgraded the content, albeit within the spirit of the original. I have extended the text, making it more general in places where the original was too specific, and added new references to source publications and currently available implementations. Mtdove (talk) 12:02, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
One other point. The page had a request for an expert, but clearly any expert on Reverse Monte Carlo will be a user of this technique, and users generally are users because they like the technique. Thus one might argue that an expert with a neutral point of view doesn't exist. I have attempted to be as neutral as possible, but am happy to discuss changes if the text doesn't come across sufficiently neutral. The RMC method does evoke strong reactions! Mtdove (talk) 11:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)