Talk:Revolt of Ghent (1539–1540)

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Medieval / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

French history stub

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've reverted the change of { {History-stub} } to { {France-history-stub} }. France doesn't make sense here. Maybe Spanish history or the Netherlands history, but neither seems right to me. The problem with the Netherlands is that this region is not in the current country of the Netherlands. Belgian history doesn't make sense either, as Belgium didn't exist yet. We could start a Flanders history stub class for the history of the region from the 13th century till 1830, everything related to Flanders (county), Burgundian Netherlands, Southern Netherlands, Austrian Netherlands and so on, I intend to see if this is possible. But maybe Flanders would be too limiting, so "Low Countries history" may be even better. Piet 10:44, 1 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

The noose nickname

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

"Since then Ghent citizens informally call themselves "noose bearers"". This makes little sense. Are the citizens of Ghent actually proud of the way their ancestors were humiliated by Charles? Perhaps it is a derogatory name someone else applied to them? Anyway, we need a source here, so I'm adding a {cn}. Bazuz (talk) 13:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Some Holocaust survivors chose not to remove the tattoos they received in the concentration camps. It's not a mark of pride for them either.Kurzon (talk) 06:40, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ghentians are proud that there ancestors stanood up against the Emperor. They failed, but at least they stood up. Paradoxically the Ghentians are also proud that the Emperor Charles was one of them, bron in Ghent. See e.g. http://www.gildevandestroppendragers.be/nl/historiek-0 Donar Reiskoffer (talk) 08:54, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic