This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I'm going to wipe out all the unreferenced parts in this article completely and do a clean start. It's poorly written and a lot of inaccurate information have been added in by some irresponsible editors. I'm going to write a new version based on translated information from Chinese Wikipedia. Of course, the referenced info can stay. Anyone opposes this idea? _LDS (talk) 05:46, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
I've done it. The editors can now add back some of the removed information, provided that it is factually accurate and supported by reliable sources. _LDS (talk) 04:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article is difficult to understand because the information is not presented coherently. In some places it is presented out of order, in others it is repeated. There is a section called 'Causes' that does not discuss any causes. I'm going to reorganise the material, removing the repetitions, and presenting it as clearly as possible in coherent order.Mccapra (talk) 10:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply