Talk:Revolution Software
Revolution Software was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Importance
editThis Article should be Highly Important, because Revolution Software made one of the most successful Adventure Classics of All Time! Plus - it was found by a Legendof the Gaming Industry: Charles Cecil! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7arazred (talk • contribs) 12:42, 17 September 2011
- Per the Importance scale for WikiProject Video games, companies are ranked Top-importance (article forms the basis of all information) if they are highly influential companies, particularly the major Japanese, American, and European companies involved in video game production, e.g. Blizzard Entertainment, Capcom, Nintendo; they are ranked High-importance (article covers a general area of knowledge) if they are top developers and publishers, e.g. Epic Games, Neversoft; they are ranked Mid-importance (article fills in general knowledge of specialized topics) if they are most other well-known companies in the industry, e.g. IGN, Gamestop, Naughty Dog; and Low-importance otherwise. Personally I'm reluctant to go even as high as Mid-importance, because no evidence has been provided of this company being well-known, so I think that Low-importance is justified. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:00, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- I personally think the company is mid-to-high (leaning to high) importance, since you could say it "has been proven notable (more will be added)."
3rd GA nomination quick-failed
editI am removing the current GAN on this, as none of the concerns from the previous GANs have been addressed. Please stop re-nominating this article for GAN as multiple reviewers have already shown how this fails by a mile. Consider this a quick-fail on the nomination. –MuZemike 21:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Quality
editExternal links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Revolution Software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314001524/http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=1&platform_id=0 to http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=1&platform_id=0
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120127204656/http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=6&platform_id=0 to http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=6&platform_id=0
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927222949/http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=7&platform_id=0 to http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=7&platform_id=0
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120715113527/http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=9&platform_id=0 to http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=9&platform_id=0
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927222706/http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=8&platform_id=0 to http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=8&platform_id=0
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927222706/http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=8&platform_id=0 to http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=8&platform_id=0
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5yPe1QRd2?url=http://www.bafta.org/awards/video-games/nominations-in-2010,1017,BA.html to http://www.bafta.org/awards/video-games/nominations-in-2010,1017,BA.html
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6ALSpvgVr?url=http://www.gameranx.com/features/id/1565/article/top-25-best-ios-games/p/4/ to http://www.gameranx.com/features/id/1565/article/top-25-best-ios-games/p/4/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)