 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | The contents of the Rex v. Stewart page were merged into Pauper's funeral on 27 November 2021 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Case
editHello! The reporting code seems to be void. I checked the case in my archive and A&E does not contain it at page 773. I found this case in an another reporter, namely Per & D (Perry and Davidson), at page 349. The year is 1840. And the original report refers to the case as "The Queen v. Stewart". Any maybe we should write more on this case though it's a rare bird, but still it has been repeatedly referred in US common law in regards with burial privacy, action for trespass, the duty to bury etc.
For such reference to this case in US common law, see. Pierce v. Proprietors of Swan Point Cemetery (1872). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.118.112.23 (talk) 13:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Regards, Anatoliy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.118.112.23 (talk) 13:00, 26 February 2018 (UTC)