Talk:Reynaldo Hill

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Pointless

edit

Keep deleting it and I will keep putting it up, so save your time.

Compromise

edit

I think the Reynaldology section in worthy but I think it could be implicated in terms of vanity. I think a compromise would be to keep the section valid and remove individual forum members and links and to closer represent the original section written by me when it was first made. Thnom 12:54, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Do not delete the Reynaldology section!

Please read the guidelines

edit

The "Reynaldology" section keeps getting deleted because it violates the vanity guidelines. Please read this page for further information.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vanity_page


Where does it violate the guidelines? The fandom of this player is legitimate and even he knows and accepts it. It is highly popular amongst the fans.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Reynaldo Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply