 | This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 15 January 2023. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
I'm not sure what happened to this article exactly but there used to be a long and perfectly detailed plot summary which I contributed to writing. Why was all the content here deleted and replaced by this junk? Aren't these changes cited or anything?
Arafitos (talk) 01:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
This book sucked Newts of vengeance 16:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Dear weenie,
- It most definitely did not suck. It's called 'one of the best fantasy novels of all time' for a reason, you ponce.
My wife's reading it now and all I can say is, however good or bad the book is, this article sucks. :) RobertM525 08:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Isn't there a general guideline regarding civility in Wikipedia somewhere? --68.81.2.64 22:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
While I agree that we should keep all discussion civil, I do have to agree with RobertM525. The article concerning Rhapsody: Child of Blood is very lacking and does not even cover the span of the entire novel. I would happily finish the article, but I have no experience in writing synopses. By the by, I love this book. Brbarnett1981 (talk) 13:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)