Talk:Rhinelander v. Rhinelander

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 3 March 2018

Alice Jones

edit

The content of this article seems to be at least half about Jones. If there is no article about Jones, should this information be incorporated into an article titled, for instance, "Rhinelander and Jones?" Interlaker (talk) 14:27, 7 November 2014 (UTC)Reply


This article should be listed under Alice Jones Rhinelander, not Kip Rhinelander. The historical relevance of this marriage is due to issues with Alice's racial status and what she was subjected to on trial (particularly in relation to photojournalism). Kip Rhinelander and his family have no other historical relevance. Sarahberry9 (talk) 03:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC) Sarahberry9Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kip Rhinelander. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kip Rhinelander. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:29, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 3 March 2018

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested, per the argument below. Dekimasuよ! 17:21, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply



Kip RhinelanderRhinelander v. Rhinelander – This page is more about the court case in general than about the plaintiff; notably, it has a lot of information about the defendant (Alice Jones) as well. Neither Rhinelander nor Jones really merits a full article by themselves. The noteworthy entity here is the famous court case. Quuxplusone (talk) 06:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Support, as nominator. See also the section above, Talk:Kip Rhinelander#Alice Jones, where a couple other people also point out that the current article is at least as much about Jones as Rhinelander. What ties the two together is the court case.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.