Talk:Rhode Island Red

Eggs

is it daily if Ÿes how much in one day (eggs)?™ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.23.248.183 (talk • contribs) .

Although she's getting on a bit now, my Rhode Island Red used to lay one egg a day. Egg production tends to reduce as the hen gets older. It also depends on the breed; Rhode Island Reds, followed closely by Sussex are the best layers, others, such as meat birds like Orpingtons are not so good. Sign your posts! CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 18:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

egg laying

Do the hens lay eggs for their entire life? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.194.97.11 (talk) 09:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Chickenbreed Infobox

A new infobox {{Infobox Chickenbreed}} has been created for chicken articles. If you see anywhere it needs improved please contact User:Stepshep. If it meets your criteria it is requested you add it to this article's page for standardization. Thanks! §hep • ¡Talk to me! 17:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 07:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Rooster-Picture?

Can someone verify that the bird on the big picture is really a rooster as it says in the caption. I have some Rhodies that look almost exactly like that "rooster" and they lay about 5 eggs a week. So I would suggest changing the caption to "A Rhode Island Red hen" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.227.7 (talk) 23:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

We just have to assume good faith on the part of the uploader. We can't overrule the uploader's description just because some of us (who have never seen the chicken in question personally) aren't 100% sure. CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 18:41, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Ok then let me put it this way: I'm 100% sure that the bird on the picture is a hen. I haven't seen the bird personally, but I also don't need to see Angelina Jolie personally to tell that she's a girl. ;-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.227.7 (talk)

Look, we can't alter the uploader's description of the photograph without irrefutable verification that the description is wrong. If you want my opinion, I'm 100% sure it's a male, judging by the size of the comb and the shape of the plumage. Angelina Jolie isn't the best analogy - she's the same species as us, so it's very easy for us to tell she's female even from a photo, as we're wired up to be able to differentiate between male and female humans much more easily than with other animals; I was also referring to the behaviour of the chicken, which only the uploader - Dictouray (talk · contribs) - would know about. If you need confirmation, ask him. By the way, please remember to sign your posts by typing four tilde characters (~~~~) after your message. CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 00:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

I've seen enough Rhodies in my life to be as sure as with Angelina: that bird is most definitely a hen. I mean, just google a few Rhodie hen and rooster pix if you don't believe me, it's pretty damn obvious. But hey, it's your call, I just hate to see such an obvious mistake. But then I also don't want to get involved in all this Wiki-Bureaucracy. I'm just a guy who knows his chickens, sees a mistake and wants to help. Is maybe changing the caption to "A Rhode Island chicken" a possible compromise, that is allowed by the rules? 75.164.227.7 (talk) 07:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm not trying to get rid of you by piling on the bureaucracy, I'm just inclined to believe Dictouray's description - he's an editor in good standing, with no suggestion that he is uploading photographs of female animals described as being male (why would anyone do such a thing?). Dictouray would also be able to observe that particular chicken's behaviour (i.e., does it lay eggs, or does it crow?), which we can't do from a still photograph. I did do a quick check of google images, and now I'm even more sure that our photo is a male. It also looks very different to my old Rhodies (this one, for instance, who wouldn't get out of frame when I was trying to photograph the Marans, much to my annoyance). I'm going to ask Dictouray to weigh in here. CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 18:46, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Message sent. CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 18:52, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

As the uploader in question, sorry I didn't see this conversation earlier or I would have replied. To thrown my hat in the ring, I'm 100% sure it's a rooster. That makes a 66.6% opinion. From the sound of it, I honestly don't know chickens as well as you. If you think that's a hen, either you're way off base or you have some solid knowledge to stand on. I'd like to assume the latter. But from personal knowledge of this one, listening to it crow every morning for years, letting it attack my foot with its spurs, and watching it mate with the hens, it's a rooster. (PS: it never layed an egg).

As something of a photographer now, I'm rather ashamed of that picture. I would welcome anyone with a better Rhode Island rooster picture to replace it. But, it does include proof of being a rooster. If you look at the very bottom edge of the picture, the top half of its right spur is there. Also, as a matter of scale, those boards behind it are 8" wide. Its crown is over 24" off the ground. Dictouray (talk) 21:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Glad to see that you decided in the end to label the hen as hen.75.175.44.93 (talk) 06:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Eh? The caption and file description still say 'rooster'. What do you mean? CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 20:26, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

I don't know. Mine finally says "A Rhode Island Red hen" instead of "A Rhode Island Red rooster". Maybe the owner found an egg under his "rooster" and decided otherwise. I have no idea. But if you have somehow still "rooster" and I have "hen" who cares as long as everybody is happy. :-) 75.175.44.93 (talk) 06:25, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Er... Are you sure you're looking at the right picture? File:Rhode Island Red rooster.jpg (near the bottom of the page) is the rooster, File:Amberbock.jpg (right at the top, in the infobox) is the hen. I haven't seen anyone change the descriptions, and the current page source is as expected. Try bypassing your browser's cache and purging the server's cache to make sure you're getting the current version of the page. CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 11:31, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Ok, that explains a lot. I was always talking about "the bird on the big picture" as I wrote in my very first posting. Didn't you read that??? This picture shows a hen and was labeled "A Rhode Island Red rooster" which was nonsense and I suggested changing it. Someone finally did that two days ago according to the history. The SMALL picture on the bottom of the page is obviously a rooster. 75.175.44.93 (talk) 15:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Sigh. Looks like we were had by some subtle vandalism. Farmboy27 (talk · contribs) changed it with this edit. Vandalism usually doesn't slip through the net ever so long like this - I (nor anybody else, it seems) never caught it on my watchlist, I guess nobody on RC patrol called it out and the bots only pick up petty vandalism (swearing and so forth). Alright, I'm sorry if I upset you. I didn't check both pictures - I thought you just meant the last picture. I didn't expect there would be vandalism that lasted so long. CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 11:55, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Requested move 04 June 2014

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn. This move request was motivated only by a desire for consistency, given that the bird articles are generally all moving to lowercase titles (as in "Bald eagle" or "Somebodyoranother's sparrow", as noted), but I must admit that the result seems a bit odd to me as well. Perhaps "Rhode Island red chicken" would work, but I really don't feel invested in advocating any change at this point, so I am withdrawing the request. BarrelProof (talk) 17:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

---

Rhode Island Red → Rhode Island red – Lowercase WP:NCFAUNA – BarrelProof (talk) 18:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

• I disagree. This is different from "Bald Eagle" or "Somebodyoranother's Sparrow." It's commonly capitalized by pretty much everyone, including academic sources, environmentalist (?) publications, Encyclopædia Britannica, and even the Urban Dictionary. I don't think we should be different from everyone else. 149.160.173.187 (talk) 19:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Dual Purpose Breed

Aren't they still a dual purpose breed? Elsa Strauss (talk) 09:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)