Rhodesia at the Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 18, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Rhodesia at the Olympics appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 November 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Rhodesia at the 1928 Summer Olympics which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 22:16, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Rhodesia at the Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Will complete this one soon. JAGUAR 18:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- "The dominion did not appear at the Games again under that banner until 1960" - unclear, what banner? Southern Rhodesia or just Rhodesia? Also link 1960 Summer Olympics
- "best result until it became Zimbabwe in 1980" - link Zimbabwe
- "including a field hockey team, to the 1964 Summer Games" - link 1964 Summer Olympics
- "In 1965, Prime Minister Ian Smith" - link Ian Smith
- "Hall, for example, won a gold medal in the welterweight division of the 1930 British Empire Games" - I would start this sentence with his first name (Leonard) included as it was confusing for a while
- "In 1965, Southern Rhodesian Prime Minister Ian Smith declared a unilateral independence from Great Britain" - this would be the United Kingdom in this instance, as 'Great Britain' only refers to the the team
- "Despite political machinations from Great Britain" - same again
- No dead links
- No dab links
This is looking good. I couldn't find any issues while spotchecking the sources and the article is well written. I only pointed out a few minor concerns like underlinking and clarity, but once they're clarified this should be good to go. JAGUAR 19:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Jaguar: Thanks for review! I think I have addressed all of these concerns, so please let me know what else needs to be done! Canadian Paul 12:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for addressing them! With all of those minor issues out the way this should be good to go. JAGUAR 13:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC)