Talk:Rhododendron subsect. Ledum
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
editThis article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:38, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Footnotes
editTrappist the monk, The GBIF site wants the citations to read: "Rhododendron subulatum (Nakai) Harmaja in GBIF Secretariat (2016). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist Dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei accessed via GBIF.org on 2017-09-23." I was trying to comply.User-duck (talk) 04:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- GBIF offer a citation so that anyone citing a page at GBIF can simply copy/paste it into another document, fiddle with formatting, and Bob's yer uncle. Their suggested format is not a requirement; and even if it were, what can they do to us if we do not comply?
- For cs1|2
|via=
is used to hold the name of a source provider other than the publisher so was misused here- GBIF do not name authors for these pages so we should not contrive a name simply to 'fill in the blanks'
- clearly the GBIF database is not a book so should not be cited as such
- the value assigned to
|doi=
is not unique; it does not take the reader to the particular page where the data that supports the Wikipedia article's text can be found, so for readers, doi is mostly useless
- —Trappist the monk (talk) 10:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)