This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Why is this called the Eaton-Rosen effect? No authors on either of the two papers (Poetics and Psych Science) have those last names, and I can’t find any references which use this name prior to it being used in this Wikipedia article. Is there something I am missing? Else, I think this should be removed. Here, for example, it seems to pretty clearly be a creation of this wiki article: https://s3.amazonaws.com/content.sitezoogle.com/u/174801/8969ce9079552791e28aaffe881f15ebbfafffe5/original/wzfeb14.pdf?response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAJUKM2ICUMTYS6ISA%2F20210825%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20210825T004738Z&X-Amz-Expires=604800&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=77227b0be419fcb05f7d30fe03e309f85302eb700a16f1a161cfb5941692a886
Maybe just include a section in the article acknowledging that this naming seems to come only from within Wikipedia, if it is judged to be too entrenched in common usage to remove? I think it is misleading to imply that someone named Eaton or Rosen was involved with this.
R2D2Poland (talk) 16:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC) I also wasn't able to find any proof for this actually being called the Eaton-Rosen effect.