Talk:Rhynchonkos

A fact from Rhynchonkos appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 April 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Early Permian microsaur Rhynchonkos (pictured) shares many similarities with Eocaecilia, and may be an ancestor of caecilians?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/April.

Wikipedia

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Rhynchonkos is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rhynchonkidae

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

To quote myself plus Michel Laurin:

Under the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999), family names remain valid if they are based on genus names that have been sunk into synonymy. The nomenclature of lepospondyls contains no less than three such cases: Gymnarthridae Case, 1910, is named after a junior synonym of Cardiocephalus Broili, 1904, Brachystelechidae Carroll & Gaskill, 1978, after a junior synonym of Batropetes Carroll & Gaskill, 1971, and Cocytinidae Cope, 1875, after a junior synonym of Brachydectes Cope, 1868. Perhaps by analogy, Ruta et al. (2003), Carroll (2007 and earlier), and Anderson (2008) continued to use the name Goniorhynchidae Carroll & Gaskill, 1978, for the monotypic family that contains Rhynchonkos stovalli (Olson, 1970). However, Goniorhynchus Olson, 1970, is not a junior synonym of Rhynchonkos; instead, Rhynchonkos Schultze & Foreman, 1981, is a replacement name for Goniorhynchus Olson, 1970, which was preoccupied by the beetle Goniorhynchus Hampson, 1896. If a taxon is to be named Goniorhynchidae, it must have the valid genus Goniorhynchus, not the invalid one, as its type; therefore, Goniorhynchidae Carroll & Gaskill, 1978, has always been invalid and should never have been erected (ICZN 1999: art. 39). Accordingly, Zanon (1988) coined the replacement name Rhynchonkidae. This is the name that should be used if one is not content to refer to the only known genus and species directly by their own names.

I was wrong in calling Goniorhynchus a beetle – it's a moth. I'll mention this in the errata section of my next-or-so paper.

Incidentally, the quoted paper is in open access, but the publisher's website has been down ("en cours de rénovation") all year (so much for "prochainement"). I've therefore linked to BioOne, which may not let you access the paper for free – so if anyone wants to read it and can't get it, tell me.

I'll now go change "Goniorhynchidae" to "Rhynchonkidae" in the Tuditanomorpha template.

David Marjanović (talk) 19:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic