Talk:Ribbit and Rip It
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ribbit and Rip It article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The same Matt Murdock as Netflix Daredevil
editMarvel.com says that this is very much the same Matt Murdock audiences have come to know and love over the years
. I think it might be worth inclusion since I believe this is the first most concrete indication we've got from Marvel that the MCU Matt is the same as the Netflix one. Obviously, I understand Marvel.com is not overseen by Marvel Studios and they don't always have inside information (and the last time they mentioned that it's the same version, they ended up removing it within a day). But it might be worth including. Thoughts? — Starforce13 20:17, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's notable. Still pissed that the NWH full biography report got deleted within a day for seemingly no reason. — SirDot (talk) 21:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- Any inclusion I think needs to be full prefaced as "Marvel.com is saying this". - Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Infobox image
editI think we could definitely use a still of either Daredevil or him and Jen. There's plenty of commentary regarding Murdock's return/his new suit, as well as commentary about the duo's relationship in the episode.
Some image suggestions:
- Option 1 - Murdock in court - Source
- Option 2 - Daredevil suit - Source
- Option 3 - Matt and Jen/a version of this if someone can get their own screenshot - Source
- Option 4 - a different scene with both of them together - Source
-- ZooBlazertalk 16:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Option 3 has seemed to be a "default" image the media's used to represent the episode, and the one I think about personally. That's what I'd go with. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:54, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Would we need a better quality version or would it be fine since it has to be scaled down anyway? -- ZooBlazertalk 17:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- If there is one that has the quality even when scaled down, that'd be good. Otherwise that one is ok. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Would we need a better quality version or would it be fine since it has to be scaled down anyway? -- ZooBlazertalk 17:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)