Talk:Richard A. Lupoff

Merging the article with Richard Lupoff

Looks like a no-brainer to me :-) Ahasuerus 00:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Why not? Go for it. Signinstranger 18:38, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

It looks like the same person to me earoot@yahoo.com

More Data

I started a Dick Lupoff page, then changed it to a redirect after finding this one. The following was entered, and I'm putting it here till I can cite sources and integrate it into the text. Anyone else wants to do so feel free.

Author and comics historian, Dick Lupoff co-edited All In Color For A Dime and The Comic-Book Book with Don Thompson.

As a professional writer, under the name of Richard A. Lupoff, Dick authored, among other things, God of the Naked Unicorn, a satirical crossover story that involved Dr. Watson of Sherlock Holmes fame meeting Tarzan, Doc Savage and other pulp and comic strip characters fighting a villain that appears to be a atire of Nebula award winning author Philip Jose Farmer.

Lupoff also authored _______

(The blank was for information on his 'Aethyr Flyer' series.)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dlupoff.jpg

Image:Dlupoff.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Richard Lupoff himself today deleted the older photo and inserted a more recent one of himself. Why does this not appear? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.208.8.210 (talk) 00:17, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mastererb.jpg

Image:Mastererb.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Groundhog day controversy

Please make a mention of the following:

"12:01 PM" is a short story by Richard A. Lupoff, which was published in the December 1973 edition of The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction. The major plot device is a time loop or time bounce, and bears great similarity to that of Groundhog Day, which was released in 1993. Lupoff was "outraged" by the theft of the idea, but after six months of legal advice, he dropped the case against Columbia Pictures. (taken from Groundhog Day's talk page)

85.227.226.235 (talk) 20:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard A. Lupoff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100209221341/http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/NomLit82.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/NomLit82.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Bibliography

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 23:34, 21 October 2018 (UTC)