Talk:Richard Dutcher
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Richard Dutcher article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Richard Dutcher be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editI wonder if anyone has a sourse on the crew members walking off the set of Brigham City. I have not heard that. I also wonder what in the movie offends members of the Church.
- Best to ask those questions on the Talk page of the article on the movie itself. — Frecklefoot | Talk 21:32, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Controversy Section
editIn this section:
"While Dutcher's portrayal of LDS missionaries in God's Army was considered only mildly offensive by many members of his faith.." - Define "many members of the LDS faith?" Isn't that kind of vague, generalized, unattributed writing, in general, against Wikipedia policy for articles? I believe those are Weasel Words. This entire section is unattributed. Pull out some attributions, and let's keep the section. Otherwise, toss it out. Please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.70.188.26 (talk • contribs) 17:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Parting Letter section
edit"The view is that the decline in gross revenue is an indication of the public's reaction to their quality."—It's not clear whether this is intended to represent the view of the critics or of Dutcher himself. (Dutcher says "Diminishing quality has brought diminishing returns" in his "parting words.") 64.255.85.206 (talk) 18:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Richard Dutcher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081006201351/http://richarddutcher.com/ to http://www.richarddutcher.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081006201351/http://richarddutcher.com/ to http://www.richarddutcher.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 20 December 2017 (UTC)