Talk:Richard Ford

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Boy who worked on railroad trains

edit

Ford discussed the significance in his life of a job as a train engineer's assistant when he was only 19 years old. See: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/20/business/a-boy-who-played-with-trains.html?pagewanted=2&adxnnl=1&ref=todayspaper&adxnnlx=1382277771-iLUaoLNlHALfslMMiU9JjA&pagewanted=all — Preceding unsigned comment added by Publius3 (talkcontribs) 15:30, 20 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

Are these novels? Poems? Songs? What?

Short stories. Check the bottom. Liz 03:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Can we change the title of the "quotes" section to "quotations"?

Fair use rationale for Image:RichardFordbookcover.jpg

edit
 

Image:RichardFordbookcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Improvements, February 2009

edit

I've added a number of footnotes to this article, where previously there were none, and have generally tried to improve the substance and clarity of the article. I hope to add some more material in due course, and shall also have a go at improving the pages relating to RF's major works.Macphysto (talk) 10:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

incomprehensible sentence

edit

What is this sentence trying to say?

Since the Rock Springs collection, Ford's fiction, particularly the "Frank Bascombe" novels (The Sportswriter, Independence Day, and The Lay of the Land), enjoy material affluence and cultural capital not associated with so-called "dirty realist" style and subject matter. Bacrito (talk) 18:22, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The paragraph was rewritten (not by me) 3 years ago (diff). The older version was comprehensible, and I have reincorporated some of that material. What do you think?--ShelfSkewed Talk 18:46, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit
 

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:15, 10 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Is this the author of Faradawn?

edit

Quest for the Faradawn is a book I truly enjoyed, and I was surprised to find that not only is there no page for it or its series, but there's absolutely no mention at all on Wikipedia. The author is named Richard Ford, so I want to know: is this the same Richard Ford, or was it a different author? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.45.169.2 (talk) 18:38, 5 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I confess, I don't know. However, the reason you have not received an answer (after almost 5 years!) is more because this is not the proper forum for such questions. The Discussion or "Talk" page is intended strictly for improvement of the referenced page. (My guess would be no, different R. Ford, as the biblio seems well developed. Try Amazon, or Abe Books, or Reddit. Or a search engine search: Google or DuckDuckGo.) rags (talk) 17:40, 28 September 2017 (UTC) ragsReply
I'm sure by now you have your answer. In the interest of closure, I determined that your R Ford, author of QftF is working in the fantasy genre, unlike this R Ford, who is more along the lines of Steinbeck or John Irving. Both Richard and Ford are quite common names, so that was likely. rags (talk) 18:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Richard Ford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:03, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply