Talk:Richard Hatherill
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Desertarun in topic Did you know nomination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Richard Hatherill article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Richard Hatherill appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 June 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 18:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Richard Hatherill survived a mutiny and a shipwreck, only to die from an illness at the age of 35?
Source: Hore, Peter (2015). Nelson's Band of Brothers: Lives and Memorials. Barnsley.: Seaforth Publishing. pp. 74–75. ISBN 9781848327795.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Margaret Saurin and Template:Did you know nominations/Waterloo Park, Norwich (edit conflict)
Created by Ykraps (talk). Self-nominated at 06:39, 8 May 2021 (UTC).
Hi Ykraps, review follows: article moved to mainspace 8 May; article exceeds minimum length and is well written; article is cited inline to a single (but excellent) source; I found the pages viewable in a Google Books preview and noted no overly close paraphrasing from there; hook facts are mentioned in the article, cited and check out; I have no issue in accepting the edit conflicted review, if you want to save the other one for later, teh work has been done. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 07:10, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks but by the time I have another nomination, I'll have got over it and be happy to do another QPQ :) --Ykraps (talk) 07:22, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
