Talk:Richard Henry Stoddard

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Poetry Mid‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Richard Henry Stoddard/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

He was also a contemporary and friend of Herman Melville's and eulogised him on his death. See Merton M Sealts Jr.'s article, Melville and Richard Henry Stoddard, American Literature (43), 1971.

== Citation problems ==

This article uses language from other sources without attribution. For example, the last paragraph of the biography section appears to come from the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica: "More important than his critical was his poetical work, which at its best is sincere, original and marked by delicate fancy, and felicity of form; and his songs have given him a high and permanent place among American lyric poets. His wife, Elizabeth Drew Stoddard was also a novelist." The language itself is a bit archaic, certainly not the authors's own. It also represents a dated critical judgment. Not many people nowadays would say Stoddard has a "high and permanent place" in literary history.Pwestove (talk) 02:39, 7 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 02:39, 7 June 2014 (UTC). Substituted at 04:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Add topic