Talk:Richard Hunt

Latest comment: 18 years ago by Nightstallion in topic Requested move

Requested move

edit

Richard Hunt (disambiguation)Richard Hunt – There is no need for an unwieldy title when the parent article title is just a redirect to it. Jdcooper 15:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Voting

edit
Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
Wha? Femto 14:29, 13 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

edit

>> "people are more likely to link to Richard Hunt than the unwieldy disambig page"

People should never need link directly to a disambiguation page in the first place, no matter what's its name. The (disambiguation) qualifier is not mandatory, but it is descriptive and helps define the purpose of the page. Femto 15:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Moved. —Nightstallion (?) 08:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply