Talk:Richard J. Smith
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Philip Trueman in topic Regarding notability
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Regarding notability
editRegarding the notability of Professor Smith, a Google Scholar search [1] brings up a number of highly cited papers, including one with 253 citations. Although I'm not an anthropologist, I would find it hard to believe that this wouldn't qualify as 'a significant and well-known academic work', and so Professor Smith would seem to satisfy at least point 3 of WP:PROF. Scog (talk) 19:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Conceded. Philip Trueman (talk) 15:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)