Talk:Richard Spring, Baron Risby

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. The individual does not appear to be well known enough by either name and the need for disambiguation is a good argument here. --rgpk (comment) 17:55, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Richard Spring → Richard Spring, Baron Risby.

Oppose - Known for being a Member of the house of commons and not as a peer. Also no disambiguation is required for this article title.--Lucy-marie (talk) 17:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Support. WP:NCPEER is quite clear. This chap is no longer wholly or exclusively known by his pre-peerage nomenclature. Disambiguation is necessary, not least because he has changed his name. Kittybrewster ☎ 15:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Support Agree with Kittybrewster. The article should be kept as Richard Spring, Baron Risby, as his title does not correspond with his surname. It it confusing to change it, and unnecessary. (Kazzi03 (talk) 20:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC))

Support per WP:NCPEER. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:37, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

• Support. Former politicians who have been ennobled are almost invariably known by their titles thereafter. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:34, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Comment - This is not a Crystal Ball and what they are currently known is what we have to take as the current commonly used name. If in the future the individual is known regularly by their ennobled title then that would be grounds to change the article title. To though say, it is expected that the names they are known by will change is not how things work on Wikipeida.--Lucy-marie (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard Spring, Baron Risby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130330093557/http://www.ukti.gov.uk:80/uktihome/media/item/403560.html to http://www.ukti.gov.uk/uktihome/media/item/403560.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)