Talk:Richard Stolley
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Joseph2302 in topic Did you know nomination
A news item involving Richard Stolley was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 22 June 2021. |
A fact from Richard Stolley appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Joseph2302 (talk) 18:15, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Abraham Zapruder sold his film to Richard Stolley because he acted like "a gentleman"? Source: The Washington Post; People magazine
- ALT1:... that Richard Stolley said delaying his meeting with Abraham Zapruder to acquire his film was the "smartest decision I ever made"? Source: The Washington Post;
- Reviewed: Garland grenade
- Comment: Eligible per Rule 1d, because it is only scheduled to appear in the "Recent Deaths" section of ITN and not as a bold link.
5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:40, 19 June 2021 (UTC).
- Expanded 5x (849 characters to 4451 characters) recently enough. Long enough. Both hooks are fine, cited, and very interesting, but I like the first one best. I wonder, though, if this is a better version: "... that Abraham Zapruder sold his film of JFK's assassination to Richard Stolley because he acted like "a gentleman"?" My version remains within the hook length requirement and, I think, is more clear. Your version, though, is click-batey, but so is mine. I leave the choice of which version to use up to you, and it won't get in the way of a successful DYK review. Hook refs good. Everything follows policies and article is neutral. QPQ not required. Nice job, good to go. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 21:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)