Talk:Richard Swinefield
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Ealdgyth in topic Reference format
Richard Swinefield has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 12, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Richard Swinefield, a medieval Bishop of Hereford, tried during his episcopate to secure the canonization of his predecessor Thomas de Cantilupe, but it did not happen until after Swinfield's death? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reference format
editHi there, I think it'd be worth moving the handful of references here to one of the automated formats, eg using sfn' or 'harvnb format, as these are now available. If I don't get a reply I'll move these in about seven days. Jim Killock (talk) 10:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Please no. I find the lack of title in sfn and harv to be utterly annoying as I have to check the references to figure out which reference is actually being used with "Name Date". Ealdgyth (talk) 13:38, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- You get this from the hover function, no? But it's not a big deal. Jim Killock (talk) 13:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Not just from the hover, but when I'm editing. It's a lot easier to figure out "Coredon Dictionary of Medieval Terms & Phrases p. 225" than {{sfn|Coredon|2007|225}}. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- You get this from the hover function, no? But it's not a big deal. Jim Killock (talk) 13:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC)