Talk:Richard Vogt (aircraft designer)
A fact from Richard Vogt (aircraft designer) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 April 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,767 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Richard Vogt (aircraft designer) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
is this correct?
editThe idea of a nuclear powered plane or a ww2 plane that could travel 9,000 miles ...?? are you sure this source is valid? Victuallers (talk) 21:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for raising a question about the accuracy of description.
- To speak frankly, I don't have good evidence on the information I quoted. The range of B&V P 200 was described in the article de:Richard Vogt without direct reference. In the article the author stated P 200 was a "Flugboot mit 8.000 km Reichweite (flying boat with 8,000 km range)" and wasn't materialized. The hypothetic range was not 9,000 miles but 8,000 km (approx. 4,320 miles).
- I found two sites mentioned the Vogt's nuclear powered aircraft (COMBATSIM.COM and History of Aerodynamics and Aircraft Design). The latter said the development was carried out in the mid 1950's. I'm not sure whether these references are correct. As I know these projects did not produce any real aircraft, the two airplanes were not available in the list of his design.
- I'd like to know a broad fact, too. -- Bluebeam (talk) 20:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Thx
editthx for your honesty. Ive raised this on the aviation portal. as an ex aerospace engineer I would say these ideas are "ambitous"/crazy but it could be there are cleverer people than I Victuallers (talk) 09:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- ha ha, I also think the idea of "nuclear-powered aircraft" is crazy rather than ambitious. But a giant flying boat which could travel 4,300 miles might be probable. What's the truth? -- Bluebeam (talk) 18:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:BV138.jpg
editThe image Image:BV138.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --13:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Operation Paperclip was an American military operation to bring German scientists and engineers to the VS after World War I. Vogt was invited or brought(?) to the U.S.A. to work there as an aeronautical engineer. --Tikker2 (talk) 11:08, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Richard Vogt (aircraft designer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080303204101/http://www.khi.co.jp:80/index_e.html to http://www.khi.co.jp/index_e.html
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080329155233/http://www.khi.co.jp:80/aero/index_e.html to http://www.khi.co.jp/aero/index_e.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)