Talk:Richard von Mises
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Karl died as an infant?
editI noticed this in the Ludwig von Mises article, as well. My question is, how did he die as an infant if there are apparently pictures of him much older?
http://mises.org/Community/media/p/231665.aspx
http://mises.org/Community/media/p/231677.aspx
http://mises.org/Community/media/p/231722.aspx —24.94.131.49 (talk) 02:46, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Name
editThe subject appears to have always called himself, "Richard von Mises", not "Richard Edler von Mises". The nobility was dissolved in Austria in 1918, so the title ceased to exist. So why is this article named "Richard Edler von Mises"? ·:· Will Beback ·:· 21:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hearing no objection, I'm going to move the article back to "Richard von Mises". ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Birthyday problem
editI deleted a claim that he introduced the birthday problem. The claimed citation for it mentioned nothing about the birthday problem and neither does the wikipedia page on the birthday problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.229.231.115 (talk) 17:38, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Philosophical Affiliation
editThe article suggests that von Mises was a logical empiricist. In fact, he wasn't even a logical positivist (not for long at any rate), and he tried to separate himself (and the movement that he saw himself as something of a spokesman for) from the Vienna Circle. For example, in his Positivsm, von Mises explained that
"The Vienna scientists [i.e., the members of the Vienna Circle] have drawn from the logical analysis of the language of science the conclusion that propositions of metaphysics which cannot be constituted in the above-mentioned manner are meaningless and do not say anything. This is the point in which the present book does not follow the logical positivists. . . . " (p. 9, Introduction).
In that same work, von Mises includes chapters on Religion and Ethics (pp. 343-355, for instance), an emphasis that members of the logical positivist school would have taken a dim view of, to say the least.
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Richard von Mises. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050213174058/http://www.gamm-ev.de/rm_preis.htm to http://www.gamm-ev.de/rm_preis.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
On mobile, the introduction stops abruptly before the information frame
editThe last sentence of the first paragraph in the introduction (before the info frame) is: "He described his work in his own words shortly before his death as being on ", with no trailing period. This is perhaps not ideal.
I propose that the first paragraph should stand on its own merit. If the quote belongs in the introduction, we could use a separate paragraph to introduce the quote. TeodorHeggelund (talk) 15:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)