Talk:Richmond (Yorks) (UK Parliament constituency)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by The joy of all things in topic Disputed edits

Untitled

edit

I believe I'm right in saying that the proper title of this constituency is Richmond (Yorks) - as I ok to go ahead and move it, or is there some subtlety I'm missing? — sjorford (talk) 13:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Heartbeat (TV Series) Claim

edit

Heartbeat is not filmed in Leyburn or set in Leyburn - neither is it set in or around the Richmond constituency - Heartbeat is set in the Yorkshire Moors, in and around the village of Goathland. It is in fact within the Scarborough and Whitby constituency. I have thus removed the paragraph about Heartbeat. Wed 11 Jun 2014 - 10:14 BST.

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Richmond (Yorks) (UK Parliament constituency)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.
  1. Requires inline references adding using one of the {{Cite}} templates
  2. Requires expansion by completing missing information
Keith D 11:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 11:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richmond (Yorks) (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richmond (Yorks) (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disputed edits

edit

2a02:c7f:b43b:6100:6850:8a9e:623a:e6b5 I have converted the information into a note with the citation you have provided; that's all we were asking for - a reliable source to back up that claim. Your use of profanity goes against WP:CIVIL and always adhere to WP:AGF, please. Thank you. The joy of all things (talk) 12:50, 6 November 2020 (UTC)Reply