This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Riverdogs became the Chicago Hounds so the team didn’t fold. As in the article it says that the team folded and relocated and also saying the Chicago Hounds are both an expansion team and the relocating Richmond team. If the team folded then they didn’t relocate. If they relocated the team didn’t fold. If Chicago was an expansion team, the Riverdogs didn’t relocate. On Hockey Db, the Riverdogs and the Hounds are one team, not two separate teams.12 I know before the relocation, the Hounds website was launched, but it doesn’t mean there a different team. When the Atlantic City Boardwalk Bullies relocated out west to become the Stockton Thunder, the Stockton website was already launched before the relocation. The article should not say the team folded and relocated and Chicago Hounds were both an expansion team and the relocating Richmond Riverdogs. The article should just simply say that the Riverdogs relocated to Chicago to become the Chicago Hounds, end of story. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.188.74.12 (talk) 12:38, 30 May 2012 (UTC)Reply