Talk:Rick Renzi

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as High-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) Person(s).

Untitled

Rick Renzi was in business in the Washington DC metro area. He returned to Arizona (accused of being a carpetbagger) to run for the newly defined congressional district one. His family has remained on the east coast.

Edits by 143.231.249.141 and 207.200.116.134

Latest comment: 19 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I reverted the edits made to this article by the above users. The edits made by 143... completely remade the article, deleting much information and replacing it with content couched in fawning language. The edits made by 207... were minor, mainly replacing "majority" with "plurality" in reference to voter registration, when there is in fact a Democratic majority in that district. I reverted thinking I was logged in, that's why it has my IP adress instead of username. --JMurphy 23:26, 21 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

current registration is 42.9% dem - not 50%... http://www.azsos.gov/election/voterreg/Active_Voter_Count.pdf

Harsh language there, dude. Anyway, sorry for the mistake, and thanks for pointing it out. Not to criticize, but you might want to consider getting yourself a username, since you're active enough to engage talk pages and such.--JMurphy 03:32, 29 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

sorry for the harsh language... i deleted it as it was out of line... i was a little touchy to you reverting my legitimate edit, but i over reacted... you're right, about the screen name, i'll take care of that soon

Edit by 143.231.249.141 have been reverted again

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I reverted the edits made by 143.231.249.141 made at 22:33, 5 December 2005, because the article was rewritten (not reverted) to look almost exactly the way that user left it about two weeks ago. A quick google search of a short phrase reveals that the user changed the article to look almost exactly like an official biography for Rep. Renzi, such as the one posted about him to the US House Intelligence Committee. The change deleted much relevant information, replacing it with an article of much lesser quality. A warning has been left on that user's talk page. --JMurphy 07:26, 6 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Delay

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

None of the allegations against DeLay have been proven. Ronnie Earle, the Tom Delay prosecutor, has a history of indictments against Democrat and Republican political enemies that have failed (see Kay Bailey Hutchison) and it has been widely reported that Earle had to shop the charges to several grand juries because some refused to indict. [1] One of the charges filed by Earle was summarily dismissed by trial judge Pat Priest. Earle has partnered up with producers making a movie, called The Big Buy, about his pursuit of DeLay that has been filming since before DeLay was notified of the charges. [2] [3] [4]

This was added because the added statement about Tom Delay is an unproven allegation that is used to make the member of congress guilty by association. Especially when there is much evidence that Ronnie Earle's indictments are politically motivated. You cannot include one side of an unproven allegation and not include the other, to do so would be unfair and biased.

That's all well and good, but last time I checked this article was about Rick Renzi, not what you think about Tom Delay's ongoing investigation and prosecution. I'm sure the expert editors who are keeping a close eye on the Delay scandal could set you straight-- if you read the article and talk page for Tom Delay. Just don't try to insert your opinion into Wikipedia, especially in a place where it's not relevant. --JMurphy 16:14, 13 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Jmurphy - If there was anything in error over my edit please state what it was, instead of your carefully phrased ad-hominem. Also the purpose of your edit was to cause guilt by association in a most unfair manner. The paragrapgh is it will read after my edit will give both the democrat say facts and the republican's say facts. Since the DeLay bit is unproven allegations in the name of fairness both sides of the indictment controversy must be published.

However your views have been taken into considerationa nd the new paragrapgh reads as follows.

Renzi also received $30,000 in campaign contributions from former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay's ARMPAC. After DeLay was indicted in 2005, Democrats criticized Renzi for not returning the money or donating it to charity. [5]. Republicans say that the charges against DeLay are politically motivated because prosecutor Ronnie Earle has a history of unsuccessful indictments against political enemies of both parties such as Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), and because it has been widely reported that Earle had to shop the charges to multiple grand juries because one refused to indict. [6] [7]

None of the facts above are in dispute. Bachs 18:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

1986 - 2000 period - request for info

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In September 2004, at OurCongress.org, a variety of detailed comments about Renzi were posted [8] . A couple of items are, I think, potentially quite valuable for this article, but the source fails WP:RS, so I am not going to use it unless a valid source can be found. In particular, anyone's help on locating sources for the following (or any contradictory info, for that matter) would be appreciated:

Property records indicate that Renzi and his wife left Arizona in 1986, when they moved to Burke, Virginia. Based on statements made by Renzi, the [Department of Defense] program [which employed Renzi] ended in the late 1980s, at which point he obtained a Virginia insurance license and ran an insurance business in Burke.

According to documents filed with the insurance commissions of three states – including Arizona – Renzi was a legal resident of Virginia. Renzi was registered as an out-of-state insurance agent in Arizona, Connecticut and Florida. [what years?]

Related to this, any information about the physical location of Renzi and Company (or "Renzi & Co. Inc.", or a variation thereof, since renamed Patriot Insurance Agency Inc.), Renzi's insurance firm, from its founding in 1989 until 2000, would be appreciated. [Note: old versions of the renzi.com website are, unfortunately, inaccessible via archive.org - and of course that may not even be the domain the company used.] Similarly, info on Renzi Vino Inc. and Renzi Investments Inc. (now Fountain Realty Development Inc.) would be appreciated - when they were started, how much money was invested and in what, etc. John Broughton | Talk 23:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Renzi's were/are residents of Burke, Virginia. I happened to have gone to school with their children.

Unfolding scandal

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the Early Life section, I changed "Renzi's father is now" to was based on this line from this story "Renzi's father, U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Eugene Carmen Renzi (retired), died on Feb. 9." Similar change made in "Father's company" section. Patrick Harrigan (talk) 17:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Huffington Post sourced? WTF people?!?

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

The mention of the alleged fight with McCain gave the Huffington Post as a source. Sorry, but the HP is nothing more than a collection of blogs from Hollywood celebrities and other liberal elites.

Further to the point, the HP gives as its source an election-year attack book on a Presidential candidate written by a partisan nobody.

Even further to the point, the author of the book gives anonymous sources as his validation.

So you have it...third-generation hearsay is now a reliable source on Wikipedia. Give me a break! Ynot4tony (talk) 17:49, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The thing is... then entry makes it clear that the source is the huffington post so anybody reading it should realize that.--Dr who1975 (talk) 17:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

P.S. According to Huffington Post... it is a liberal news website... not a blog, even if you or somebody reading the page disagrees... my previous comment still allows it to be used.--Dr who1975 (talk) 18:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Regardless of what they call themselves, Huffington Post is a collection of BLOGS. They feature OPINIONS, and are readily grouped BY AUTHOR.

Anyone with $25 can start up a domain and call it a news website...but that simply does not MAKE it a news website, nor does it come close to making it a reliable source.

Again, I ask, what is the standard here? Can I post MY OPINIONS on the website I recently purchased, then source them for my own politically motivated Wikipedia edits? C'mon, this is getting silly. Huffington Post is no more a reliable source than my blog on myspace.

Just re-consider: The source for this UNVERIFIED INCIDENT is...an OPINION WEBSITE...it's source is A BOOK YET TO BE PUBLISHED...the book's source is "ANONYMOUS SOURCES".Ynot4tony (talk) 18:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Rick Renzi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rick Renzi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060707112402/http://www.house.gov/list/press/az01_renzi/hr2427.html to http://www.house.gov/list/press/az01_renzi/hr2427.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:46, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rick Renzi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080730201058/http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/electionInfo/index.html to http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/electionInfo/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Rick Renzi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

AnomieBot problem

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I found dead links at Wayback citations and changed some. AnomieBot reversed a change, "rescuing" a dead link. I'm not sure if there's a way around this. Activist (talk) 05:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rick Renzi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20061002122212/http://www.ourcongress.org/race/az01 to http://www.ourcongress.org/race/az01

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rick Renzi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:44, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic