Reversion to uncited stuff

edit

"Vivaldi" is reverting the removal of unsubstantiated -- and plainly self-serving -- claims on Mr. Salomon's part, claiming that the REMOVAL of sourceless claims itself requires claims.

Removing citation-less PR-speak does not require a citation. Rather, the citationless claims should not have been there to begin with. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.10.120 (talk) 04:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Didnt he start a company then sell out and thats how he made money? Besides his dads wealth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.103.48.146 (talk) 00:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup

edit

I removed the following uncited sentence fragment that looked tacked-on and completely out of context:

Most commonly been referred to as "New Jersey's Dead End"

This article in general needs cleanup and sources. James A. Stewart (talk) 23:31, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Does this guy really deserve a Wiki article?

edit

That's pretty much all I have to ask. Does anybody else think this should be put up for deletion? Jg2904 (talk) 07:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Maybe. Geraldshields11 (talk) 15:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
There are plenty of citations showing media coverage; that's pretty much the only criteria required for a BLP article. I think a better question I have to ask myself is how he managed to get onto my watchlist! JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply