Talk:Rickon Stark

AfD 2005

This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Rickon Stark. The final result was Merge and redirect to House Stark. --Deathphoenix 18:14, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Huh, that is 10 years ago. --Mario Payne (talk) 19:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

That one is. This one, also mentioned at the top of this talk page, is more recent. Brendan Moody (talk) 19:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rickon Stark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111203062220/http://grrm.livejournal.com/178461.html to http://grrm.livejournal.com/178461.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

"removal of content"?

@AffeL: Could you explain this? "removal of content" is not a valid reason to revert when I had already provided a policy-based explanation for why I had removed it. Specifically, the content is WP:IRRELEVANT: comments by the actor who plays this character about a different character belong in our Art Parkinson article or at List of A Song of Ice and Fire characters#Osha.

I know you and I have our differences, but you should at least behave professionally: it really looks like you only reverted this edit because I was the one who made it, and I can't think of any other possible explanation.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Why did you remove that, that text was about how the different actor/character helped Art Parkinson play Rickon Stark, so yes, it does belong in this article. - AffeL (talk) 10:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

How did a fictional character help the actor play a different character? That makes no sense. And the point about how Parkinson found it "very easy to work off" Tena was really easy to miss. The rest was all about Tena as an actress and her portrayal of Osha. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 10:35, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

How it did help the actor is a question that Art Parkinson only can answer. You can remove the unrelated stuff about Tena, I won't mind that. But I do not agree with remoing the stuff about Tena helping Parkinson on playing Rickon. - AffeL (talk) 13:42, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Duplicated quotation

At the end of the TV Adaptation section, just before the first subsection, there are two quotations by Art Parkinson about his feelings on Rickon's death. Both are the same quotation (well, the second one is a bit longer). I've tried twice to remove the first one to avoid this duplication, and twice my edition has been reverted. May I ask why do we want this duplication?--Gorpik (talk) 11:06, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

@Gorpik: You might want to chime in on ANEW; I knew AffeL (talk · contribs) had edit-warred with me and Curly Turkey (talk · contribs) in the last twelve hours or so, but I didn't notice that someone else also been involved. Sorry about not notifying you earlier. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 11:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

No need to. I hope we can sort this out through the Talk page.--Gorpik (talk) 11:48, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

I'm an educator by trade, because I enjoy interacting with naive optimists in the real world, but I'm not going to waste time trying to convince you that the root of this problem will be resolved on one article talk page when a dozen similar attempts have failed. You could probably reinstate your edit now and no one would revert back, but the next time you tried fixing another article written by this same editor the same thing would happen again. I seriously thought a block would make him reflect on how he edits, but it seems to have only made it worse.

But yeah, I do think you could reinstate your edit at this point. He wouldn't revert you a third time with the ANEW thread open.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 12:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

I did not notice that it was the same quote, I fixed it now. - AffeL (talk) 13:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Fluff

This is fluff that I've removed from the lead, as it doesn't even mention the character and can't seriously be argued to be "lead worthy", or even really encyclopaedic—it's fluff. Unsurprisingly, the editwarrior AffeL has restored it without making any attempt to justify it, along with all his other editwarring. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 06:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Sorry about that. You can go ahead and remove that part, I have no problem with that. - AffeL (talk) 10:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)