Talk:Ricky Marvin

Latest comment: 7 years ago by MPJ-DK in topic GA Review
Good articleRicky Marvin has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 21, 2017Good article nomineeListed
February 27, 2019Good topic candidatePromoted
August 17, 2022Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ricky Marvin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ricky Marvin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GaryColemanFan (talk · contribs) 19:18, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

I made a few minor edits on this article while doing the review. There are no major problems with any of the GA criteria. The article is stable, neutral, verifiable (all links are working), broad in coverage while remaining focused, and illustrates with a free use picture. The writing is solid, and I just had four questions:

  • You say that he is the son of Ricardo Fuentes, but then you refer to his father as Aries.
  • Yes i will clarify that Aries was his ring name, Ricardo Fuentes his given name.
  • What is a Lightning match?
    • 1 fall, 10 minute time limit, which is unusual in Mexico. I will figure out the best way to phrase it.
  • Is there a source for the title win convincing him to stay in Japan?
    • I believe there was an interview stating it, I will find it
  • What is a decision match?
    • A match for a vacant championship - sometimes the finals of a tournament, sometimes just a singles match. i will figure out a clear way to phrase it.

I will put this review on hold pending responses to the above questions. GaryColemanFan (talk) 19:18, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply