Talk:Right of conquest
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editTurkey? I assume that that's a reference to the medieval conquest of Anatolia by the Seljuk Turks... which has very little to do with the modern state of Turkey. You might as well list every state in the Americas, too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.49.20.41 (talk) 23:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
status quo
editI reinstated some text that was removed as OR, but I'm suspicious that it was removed in excessive haste.
I will however be content to mark it as needing citations to back it up. If it's true, there should be references soon enough. Shentino (talk) 10:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
"finally as UN General Assembly Resolution"
editGeneral Assembly resolutions are explicitly reduced to "recommendations" by the UN charter. So where was it actually codified into more than that? -- 95.90.218.184 (talk) 12:32, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
"Although civil wars continued, wars between established states have been rare since 1945"
LOLLOLLOOL funniest thing ive read all week
at least say something like 'wars between established states that have resulted in an internationally recognized change of borders have been rare since 1945' 74.193.81.42 (talk) 04:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm first and foremost curious about the history of the use of the term itself?
editThis page as is makes it seme like the topic wasn't discussed till WW2 but I'm pretty sure the phrase is used in Shakespeare in the Henry VI plays. KuudereKun 21:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)