Talk:Right to Information Act, 2005
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Right to Information Act, 2005 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RTInation was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 14 December 2011 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Right to Information Act, 2005 on 14 December 2011. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
|
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2020 and 15 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Izzy.vin. Peer reviewers: Celinewherritt.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
editRanjesh Singh At-Bhagalpur Bihar Right Hend Saide
Recent changes by User:Pdbhatia , User:Onkarr
editThis is an article on the Right to Information Act 2005. It is not an article on RTI movement, RTI activism etc. Kindly confine yourselves to the subject and refrain from POV pushing, promoting a particular external website etc. Aghore (talk) 08:23, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Add CIC Landmark Judgement "Political Parties Under RTI "
editI added CIC chief Landmark judgement "Political parties under RTI. Pls further add more information on this section. ThinkingYouth (talk) 14:18, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
CIC landmark Judgement on Political parties inclusion in RTI ,I request an individual page should be created about it,,discussing history of this CIC judgement and add Role and Contribution of ADR Reform activists and RTI Activist Subhash Aggarwal on this Historic and Landmark Judgement. ThinkingYouth talkThinkingYouth (talk) 06:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- Please refer this article: Save RTI. The "Background" section of the article has mention of Mr. Anil Bairwal and Mr. S. C. Agrawal. - Navinpc (talk) 30 September 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 11:39, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Content removal
editWhy is content sourced to humanrightsinitiative.org being removed? They meet WP:RS. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:17, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
hlw
edithlw sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:590:3C03:B3:59E4:850A:10BE:2049 (talk) 17:43, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Requested move 16 October 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved pending G6 deletion to make room. Non controversial, and consistent with policy. Tiggerjay (talk) 19:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC) Tiggerjay (talk) 19:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
(non-admin closure) Right to Information Act → Right to Information Act, 2005 – the current title is not the actual name of Act, so I propose a redirect to full name -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 09:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support, per nom and MOS:LAW. this link confirms that "Right to Information Act, 2005" is the correct title. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 18:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Improvements to Article
editSources to use
Sharma, Aradhana. “State Transparency after the Neoliberal Turn: The Politics, Limits, and Paradoxes of India’s Right to Information Law.” PoLAR: Political & Legal Anthropology Review, vol. 36, no. 2, Nov. 2013, pp. 308–325. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1111/plar.12031
Aniket Aga, and Chitrangada Choudhury. A Dappled Sun: Bureaucratic Encounters in the Working of the Right to Information Act in India. Vol. 38, no. 3, 2019, pp. 540–556. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edspmu&AN=edspmu.S1548226X18300132&site=eds-live.
Izzy.vin (talk) 02:28, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Science
editA 2409:4063:401B:B64E:8D20:E195:334C:A24B (talk) 13:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
kuppala surya rao dismissal and joining order
editkuppala surya rao 2401:4900:4B3A:565C:142B:61DA:B4F9:7AA7 (talk) 15:33, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
The RTI Bill was passed by Parliament of India on 15 June 2005 and came into force with effect from 12 October 2005. Every day on an average, over 4800 RTI applications are filed. In the first ten years of the commencement of the act, over 17,500,000 applications had been filed.[2]
editThe RTI Bill was passed by Parliament of India on 15 June 2005 and came into force with effect from 12 October 2005. Every day on an average, over 4800 RTI applications are filed. In the first ten years of the commencement of the act, over 17,500,000 applications had been filed.[2] 2402:3A80:670:D332:AD92:FC50:4D7D:1286 (talk) 23:42, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
RTI
editIndia Education Program course assignment
editThis article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program.
The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 20:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)