Talk:Rigveda Wiki

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Nemo bis in topic License controversies

About Critic

edit

I think it was very careful part of this article. It might be use the emotional expression. We need to more reference and talking about this.--Tmannya (talk) 08:30, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference

edit

I had to put Rigveda wiki website itself to reference features and history as that is only availble source at this point.Db9023 (talk) 06:03, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Did You Know

edit

@Tmannya and Db9023: Let's try to get this featured at Wikipedia:Did You Know. I'll take crate of this, but you need to improve the quality of the language: too many sentences have grammatical errors. Please try to fix it by Friday. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:00, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Some English language sources

edit

You may want to incorporate the following in the article, either as reference or external links:

--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Those two websites/wikis have quite old information. For examples, it mentions Monowiki as an Rigveda wiki engine which is no longer used. So I can't use these as a reference, but thanks a lot for your help. Db9023 (talk) 22:34, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rigveda Wiki. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

License controversies

edit

Does someone know anything about the controversies on the license? I've just removed a sentence about a supposed change in the Namu Wiki license in June 2015 because [3] shows the same license as [4]. Is the issue that the original wiki didn't have a public license but later added one? Nemo 14:44, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply