Talk:Rik Fox

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2607:F598:B24A:120:4C20:C91B:5308:C0A0 in topic This article is terribly opinionated.

Page Author

edit

I agree with all of the remarks that state Rik Fox wrote this page (at least the earliest version of it) himself. The overall style of the page, lack of structure, overblown detail in certain areas, and ego-centric tone in places would imply this, plus I have other reasons for suspecting this as well.

I believe Rik is more than worthy of a page on Wikipedia, but I believe the page as it exists now should be scrapped and should be written from scratch by a neutral party. However, this is entirely up to the administrators/moderators. Just throwing in my two cents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ttc817 (talkcontribs) 23:25, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I do agree that this page should be restarted or heavily edited. It does not sound like a neutral article. The part of this article that is really bothersome is the Discography. Most of it includes "No known video or recorded material" after each entry which means no one can source many parts of it properly. It sounds like a biased article section covering any attempt to source it. - SunsetStripRebel (talk) 00:39, 31 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality.

edit

This article is extremely biased, and the overall tone strongly suggests Rik himself (or his wife) wrote it; there's hardly any neutrality whatsoever and a large amount of egotism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FracturedMirror (talkcontribs) 22:01, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks I have done a lot of the work on this page. I have never met and do not know Rik Fox. I do not know if he is married or not. Feel free to change it just remember to be friendly. Not to change just because you disagree with this page. If you know this person, do not edit the page at all. MDSanker (Talk to me) 01:09, 07 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bad Style / missing neutrality

edit

Especially the Paragraph "WASP" is in bad shape concerning grammar and syntax. If cleared out some of the mistakes, but can't do all of them because I don't even understand the exact meaning of some of the sentences. Also, this section sounds very biased! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoco24 (talkcontribs) 09:58, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Is this a real wikipedia article?

edit

I thought it was a joke. I will hate this person forever now just because of all those completely non encyclopedic information that I was forced to read through my visit to page. The one who's responsible for this should give up and understand what an encyclopedia really means. Just check the other pages, dude. This is way ridiculous and makes the man himself look ridiculous first of all. --Betelguese000 (talk) 22:36, 13 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Rik Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rik Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

This article is terribly opinionated.

edit

The section about Fox’s disputed membership in W.A.S.P. should be completely rewritten. 2607:F598:B24A:120:4C20:C91B:5308:C0A0 (talk) 07:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply