Talk:Rim Tim Tagi Dim/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Nascar9919 (talk · contribs) 21:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: ImStevan (talk · contribs) 14:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
I think this article could receive good article status
Writing
editIt is reasonably well written.
- At certain points in the article, the terms "grand final" and "final" are used a lot in succession
- @ImStevan: Done? Let me know if this works for you. Cheers, mate! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 14:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks — IмSтevan talk 14:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @ImStevan: Done? Let me know if this works for you. Cheers, mate! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 14:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing any grammatical errors in this article, and the article follows a structure similar to that of related articles — IмSтevan talk 14:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Verified
editIt is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- (reference section):
- (inline citations to reliable sources):
- (OR):
- (copyvio and plagiarism):
Eurovision Fun
edit- Eurovision Fun is used as a source in multiple places (refs 36, 37, 38, 40 and 42), despite recommended caution for the site, change the sources if possible — IмSтevan talk 15:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- As much as I'd like to, they're the only site that publishes betting odds on a periodical basis. Wiwibloggs does it once in a blue moon, and no other site bothers to publish them. Will this still work? Cheers, mate! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 15:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- I guess it's fine since they included screenshots of said odds. Perhaps adding an additional source such as EurovisionWorld through the Internet Archive would be benefitial — IмSтevan talk 15:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- As much as I'd like to, they're the only site that publishes betting odds on a periodical basis. Wiwibloggs does it once in a blue moon, and no other site bothers to publish them. Will this still work? Cheers, mate! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 15:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio
edit- Passed Earwig with flying colors (10.7% match) — IмSтevan talk 15:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Source spot-check
edit- Done — IмSтevan talk 14:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Should clarify, chekced sources 15, 92, 16, 118, 74 — IмSтevan talk 09:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Broadness
editIt is broad in its coverage.
- (major aspects):
- (focused):
- The article covers all aspects of the song and its influence, whilst not straying off the track — IмSтevan talk 09:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
NPOV
editIt follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
Stability
editIt is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No comments here, passes based on the article history — IмSтevan talk 15:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Images
editIt is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Cover
editThe cover is properly rationaled as non-free — IмSтevan talk 15:18, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Illustrative images
editCommons contains some images from the Eurovision pre-party tour that could be used in the promotion section. Other than that, the one picture used in the article is on commons and uploaded by the author, and has an appropriate caption — IмSтevan talk 15:18, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @ImStevan: Added photo. Cheers, mate! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 08:28, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Overall
editOverall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Overall, the article is properly referenced, covers all aspects of the composition, is sufficiently long and illustrated properly. Looking forward to reading other articles from this contributor — IмSтevan talk 09:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC)