Talk:Rime riche
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
2008-01-23 Automated pywikipediabot message
edit | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
this article makes little sense
editA "rime riche is a form of rhyme with identical sounds, if different spellings." So far so good. Then "in French poetry, rhymes are sometimes classified [...] according to the number of rhyming sounds in the two words [...]. For example to rhyme "parla" with "sauta" would be a poor rhyme [...], to rhyme "cheval" with "fatal" a sufficient rhyme, and "grise" with "brise" a rich rhyme."
Hold on: each of these examples (parla/sauta, cheval/fatal, grise/brise) rhymes exactly one sound. (What is a "sound"?) What makes cheval/fatal better than parla/sauta? Is it the final consonant? And what about grise/brise? That doesn't meet the definition of "identical sounds" since the words start differently.
Then we have "a good French example" where the rhyme is éléphants/enfants. How is this a rime riche? These words do not have identical sounds. And does the '-nts' ending count as a consonant even though it's effectively only pronounced as part of the vowel? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.72.227.14 (talk) 16:37, 3 November 2021 (UTC)