Talk:Ripuarian Wikipedia

Wikipedia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

position on category page

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

You might consider changing the third line from the bottom from

[[Category:Wikipedias by language]]

to

[[Category:Wikipedias by language|Ripuarian]]

As it is, this page is alphabetized on the category page under "W" for "Wikipedia", while all the other pages -- whose names begin with the name of their language -- are alphabetized by language. The listing would still be "Wikipedia of Ripuarian languages", but it would be alphabetized under "R", as appropriate for "Ripuarian languages". --Thnidu (talk) 23:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Seeing no response pro or con, I have just made this change. It makes me wonder if I've the only person to pay attention to this page... and I just happened across it! --Thnidu (talk) 04:00, 30 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic